🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.